UPA won the Confidence motion or rather...bought it. And i must praise this govt. for it's ability to buy it's way through. Cost per MP= Rs.25 crore. Amar Singh calls Mayawati -'An Elephant' and himself a 'Humble Man'. If Amar Singh is humble man, i wonder which political ritchie gifting his bollywood friends cars and other expensive gifts. Other than that a BJP MP presented concrete evidence in the form of live cash, obviously since it's in cash it might be anyone who has given him the one, realise how smart indian politicos are. The UPA had attempted buying that MP, but he gave more weightage to loyalty. Many other Member Parliaments'(MPs) thought this is the moment to cash in on and Voila! MP lelo..MPs on Sale..BUY A VOTE, pretty much resembling a vegetable market, but this is 'Indian MP Market'. Look at the kind of MPs the UPA has fallen on - Shibu Soren, a murder convict!! To all Politicians in foreign countries who want to learn how to buy MP's , you can very well learn it from Mr. Amar Singh and all the politicos in the UPA govt. MPs on Sale!!!!!
Tuesday, July 22, 2008
INDO-US NUKE DEAL: The Truth of the Matter
To all my fellow human beings who are still wondering what the Indo-US Nuke Deal is all about and why there is such a upheavel about it in Parliament. I present to them the objectionable clauses of the Nuke Deal-The Hyde Act. Behind which a lot is hidden. The Clauses-
1.These include a statement that the US will only agree to nuclear cooperation with a non-NPT state if “such cooperation induces the country to... refrain from actions that would further the development of its nuclear weapons programme”; a passage that says the US will cooperate with countries if they have a congruent foreign policy, which includes working with the US on non-proliferation efforts; and a declaration that countries outside the NPT pose a non-proliferation challenge.
2.an article to restrict the transfer of equipment and technology related to enrichment, reprocessing and heavy water production, and a clause to prevent the transfer of nuclear equipment, materials or technology from other NSG countries should nuclear transfers to India Though these clauses are mere recommendations but the clauses which are a danger to the sovereignity of the Republic of India and could make our bovine nation subservient to US are-
1.Two of these fall under Section 104(d), which outlines restrictions on nuclear transfers to India. Section 104(d)1 states that civil nuclear cooperation between the US and a non-NPT weapons state cannot “in any way assist, encourage, or induce that country to manufacture or otherwise acquire nuclear weapons or nuclear explosive devices.”
2.Section 104(d)3 puts termination of the nuclear transfers in the hands of the president.
3.That leaves Section 106, which will ensure that the nuclear exemption for India will cease to be effective if “the president determines that India has detonated an explosive device.”
Is the Nuke Deal really biased or is Left trying to get into power by making a controversy out of it?
1.These include a statement that the US will only agree to nuclear cooperation with a non-NPT state if “such cooperation induces the country to... refrain from actions that would further the development of its nuclear weapons programme”; a passage that says the US will cooperate with countries if they have a congruent foreign policy, which includes working with the US on non-proliferation efforts; and a declaration that countries outside the NPT pose a non-proliferation challenge.
2.an article to restrict the transfer of equipment and technology related to enrichment, reprocessing and heavy water production, and a clause to prevent the transfer of nuclear equipment, materials or technology from other NSG countries should nuclear transfers to India Though these clauses are mere recommendations but the clauses which are a danger to the sovereignity of the Republic of India and could make our bovine nation subservient to US are-
1.Two of these fall under Section 104(d), which outlines restrictions on nuclear transfers to India. Section 104(d)1 states that civil nuclear cooperation between the US and a non-NPT weapons state cannot “in any way assist, encourage, or induce that country to manufacture or otherwise acquire nuclear weapons or nuclear explosive devices.”
2.Section 104(d)3 puts termination of the nuclear transfers in the hands of the president.
3.That leaves Section 106, which will ensure that the nuclear exemption for India will cease to be effective if “the president determines that India has detonated an explosive device.”
Is the Nuke Deal really biased or is Left trying to get into power by making a controversy out of it?
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)